Logical fallacy

Affirming a disjunct

Also known as: Fallacy of the alternative disjunct
Uncommon#70 of 71 by how common ← All logical fallacies

What it is

Reasons "A or B; A; therefore not B", treating an inclusive "or" as if it were exclusive.

Example "You can have coffee or tea. You had coffee, so you didn't have tea."

Related

References

More in “Invalid logical form”